From NPR, no less…

 Although New York Sen. Hillary Clinton won the largest states and collected slightly more delegates than Illinois Sen. Barack Obama in the Democrats’ Super Tuesday primaries and caucuses on Feb. 5, her presidential campaign spent the rest of the week repositioning her as a kind of underdog. It all has to do with her campaign money, and who’s contributing to her.

So, a rich lady loans her campaign 5 million dollars and that makes her an underdog? If that’s true, bring on the disestablishment, baby!  I must be missing something …

 This week, Clinton and her advisers declared that Obama is the “establishment” candidate. When chief strategist Mark Penn explained the Feb. 5 Super Tuesday results to reporters Wednesday, he said, “We went through 10 days of wall-to-wall coverage of Sen. Obama and his establishment campaign, of big endorsements, money, ads on the Super Bowl. And Hillary Clinton again bounced back.”

Wow. Holy sh*t! Hey, I have a message to the states yet to have primaries …

BE CAREFUL! SHE MIGHT BE DELUTIONAL.

CLINTON:  And the candidate herself said of Obama’s Super Tuesday performance, “Well, he sure had a lot of establishment support yesterday, and I feel very good about the results.”

Wow. Holy s*it! Hey lady, newsflash, your husband is the ultimate embodiment of “establishment help.” In fact,  you’re the #2 example, followed by Kissinger (3), Putin (4) and Reagan (Dead).

It seems you forget that you’re running as a Democrat and, sadly for you, Democrats aren’t nearly as gullible or risible as their Republican counterparts. 40 some MILLION dollars in SMALL DONATIONS is called popular support. Your stack of big donations makes you establishment, and your loan to yourself makes you kind of like Romney witout the moxie.

Please, please, run a fuc*ing campaign and knock off the dipshit. Please? Pretty please?